
Imperial College London recently hosted two conversations with prominent venture capitalists – Danny Rimer from Index Ventures and Michael Eisenberg from Benchmark Capital. Both operate in an industry where detecting an elusive “black swan” is critical and where speed to market is often more important than intellectual property.
Each described an eerily similar investment story.
The first was about an entrepreneur trying to pitch Mr. Eisenberg. This person went through the motions of mailing a presentation and following up… to no response. Instead of more calling/emailing/begging the entrepreneur tracked down two of Mr. Eisenberg’s close business associates using social media. Despite having no previous connection, both were persuaded to contact Benchmark on the entrepreneur’s behalf. I believe the quote was “I wouldn’t have invested if my mother-in-law called, but these guys got my attention.”
In another example, Mr. Rimer described his investment in a London-based online startup. When first arriving at the company’s “office” he quickly realized the space also doubled as the founders’ home. The entrepreneurs were so engrossed in developing their business, work literally took over their lives. Before any product discussions took place, Mr. Rimer was sold by experiencing the entrepreneurs’ extreme level of energy and dedication. The investment ended up being a huge success.
As an MBA candidate at Imperial College, I meet a wide variety of entrepreneurs. Some have already formed a business and some just have an idea. Most ask my opinion about what they should do next. I envision Mr. Eisenberg and Mr. Rimer’s advice would be “If you believe in your idea, stop at nothing until you succeed.” The entrepreneurs in these stories had the drive and focus to realize their vision. The investments were not made on the basis of a business plan, but because of the people involved. I’m told Warren Buffet also shares a similar people-based investment theory.
When raising money, consider what your investor first looks at when making a decision. A speaker recently told me they immediately turn to the financials when evaluating a business plan. This person was big on milestones and 60-page term sheets. Both may be necessary. I think Mr. Rimer and Mr. Eisenberg focus first on people because they realize drive and adaptability are critical factors to success. They assume industries can change. They assume the next ipod/iphone/ipad will emerge. They assume bad things can happen but people persevere.
It’s how entrepreneurs steer their ship when a hurricane hits that makes all the difference.

I completely agree with your article.
Unfortunately, I have had a chance to see too many brilliant ventures going down the drain due to unskilful management teams, while pretty straight forward ideas performed miraculously under the control of talented and devoted entrepreneurs.
Andy,
I think you’re right on. Execution and perseverance are difference makers. Lots of people can have similar ideas/plans, but if business were a battle of “better ideas” people wouldn’t need to be involved. It’s about the people and execution.
I always liked the expression “even the best strategies go out the window when the first punch is thrown”…goes to the idea that if the fighters are well conditioned they can survive, vs just being well prepared via a “plan”.
Paul Graham talked about why he invited the AirBnB team to join YCombinator, and it basically came down to the fact that they had many unsuccessful launches but persistence got them through. Paul Graham stated “you guys won’t die, your like cockroaches”. Because of that, he knew they’d be successful in the long run and a worthy investment. http://bit.ly/gyiiLo via YC Start-Up School
Thanks for the thoughts Eli. Just came across another great example of AirBnB – this time how a VC didn’t invest in them (but should have). http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2011/03/airbnb.html